Skip to main content
GLOBAL ORGANIC TEXTILE STANDARD
ECOLOGY & SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

Global Standard launches public consultation for the new Global Responsible Textile Standard (GRTS).
Join the conversation now and help shape the future of responsible textiles.

GOTS Project: GOTS and European Space Agency Collaborate for Integrity in Organic Cotton

GOTS Project:
GOTS and European Space Agency Collaborate for Integrity in Organic Cotton

Revolutionising Organic Cotton: A Game-Changing Collaboration


In 2022, GOTS embarked on an innovative collaboration poised to redefine the organic cotton industry. This groundbreaking project is a joint effort between GOTS, the European Space Agency (ESA), and Marple GmbH, a German software development firm. Marple had previously conducted a feasibility project, Cotton Cultivation Remote Assessment (CoCuRA), in Uzbekistan which demonstrated the potential of remote satellite monitoring to accurately distinguish cotton fields and, notably, to determine whether these fields were managed organically. That project piqued GOTS's interest, aligning with their mission to advance cutting-edge technologies that enhance the integrity of the organic textile sector.

Project Goals

The primary objective of this collaborative project is to train artificial intelligence (AI) to use satellite data for the remote detection of cotton fields while classifying them according to their cultivation standard. This includes identifying whether cotton fields are organic, in-conversion, natural (low-input), hybrid (high-input), or GMO. By enabling remote monitoring of cotton cultivation, this initiative serves as a potent deterrent against potential fraudulent practices. Moreover, it equips GOTS with the means to identify risks to organic cotton cultivation, such as the proximity of genetically modified (GM) fields that could lead to contamination. The integration of farm data will further facilitate the generation of realistic projections for yield and, consequently, estimates of available organic cotton.


 Data Collection

The project encompasses a broad spectrum of data, including GPS polygons (field area), cultivation standard (conventional, in-conversion, organic), crop type (cotton, wheat, maize, etc.), and irrigation method (e.g., rain-fed, flooding, sprinkler, drip). This comprehensive data will be instrumental in training the AI to remotely assess fields outside of the selection area and classify them based on their cultivation standard.


Promising Results

Marple's prior pilot study in Uzbekistan yielded remarkable results, with their AI achieving a 98% accuracy rate in distinguishing between organic and conventional cotton fields. Building on this success, the collaboration between GOTS and Marple, with the support of ESA, aims to enhance the AI's capabilities. This advancement has the potential to significantly bolster the integrity and traceability of organic cotton.


Impact Beyond Certification

 

 

The impact of this project extends beyond the identification of certified organic cotton fields. It is expected to accurately identify fields that, while not yet certified, exhibit the potential for a seamless transition to organic cultivation due to their adherence to traditional and ecologically friendly farming practices. Identifying these areas could lead to new economic opportunities for small-scale farmers and their communities, and help grow the industry, which is already unable to meet the growing consumer demand for organic cotton.


The collaboration between GOTS, ESA, and Marple represents a pivotal moment in the organic cotton industry. By harnessing the potential of remote satellite monitoring and artificial intelligence, this project is set to elevate the integrity and development of organic cotton cultivation. It embodies GOTS' commitment to continuous improvement and innovation in serving the sustainable textile sector. As Jeffrey Thimm from GOTS succinctly puts it, "Technologies like this will be a game changer regarding the integrity and promotion opportunities of organic cotton."


Read more …GOTS Project: GOTS and European Space Agency Collaborate for Integrity in Organic Cotton

Regenerative is Organic

Regenerative is Organic

by Jeffrey Thimm, GOTS Organic Production Specialist

As the importance of sustainability comes more into focus for the textile sector – whether for legal compliance or market demand by conscientious consumers – more concerted efforts are commendably being made by actors across the value chain to source fibres that are produced and processed in socially and ecologically responsible ways. Furthermore, the necessity of traceability to validate claims of sustainability has been well established. But with the plethora of voluntary sustainability standards emerging, it’s worth strengthening our conceptual frameworks and taking a closer look at what constitutes the lofty pursuit of “regenerative agriculture”.

REGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE IS NOT A NEW CONCEPT -
IT HAS BEEN A CENTRAL PILLAR OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE SYSTEMS ACROSS THE GLOBE AND HUMAN HISTORY, FOR WHICH STRATEGIES AND METHODS HAVE BEEN EVOLVING WITH THE DISTINCT AIM OF INCREASING SOIL FERTILITY AND FOOD SECURITY.

The specific practices differ depending on ecological and social context, but regenerative agriculture is united in its purpose – to reverse soil degradation, improve agroecological resilience, and sustainably provide food, fiber and fuel. Aside from repairing and revitalizing degraded landscapes, it is now additionally tasked with halting and reversing greenhouse gas emissions and increasing resilience to climate change.
Fortunately, the rising interest in regenerative agriculture has also been illuminating the central role of the farmer in our global economy, and how our sourcing practices impact the sustainability of the very foundations of society. It’s not just about textiles and fibers, it’s also about our posture towards ethical commerce and our willingness to pay a fair price – more than a living wage – to value the livelihoods and communities at the source of our supply chains.

WE CANNOT AFFORD TO PAY LESS THAN THEIR TRUE WORTH.
AND AFTER CENTURIES OF EXPLOITATION, IT IS NOW REQUIRED TO REINVEST IN REVITALIZING AGRICULTURE IF WE WANT TO BE SUSTAINABLE.

The established, internationally regulated voluntary sustainability standard that already embodies the principles and aims of regenerative agriculture is Organic/Bio/Öko. With origins dating back over a century in the western world (inspired and informed by traditions dating back millennia), the global movement now represented by the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) has built upon shared values and learnings to develop an evolving codification of production, verification and marketing norms. The concept of regenerative is embedded in the philosophy and practice of organic, because organic farm management is designed to protect and nurture the land, animals, and the farmers we all depend upon. Furthermore, the transition phase from conventional to organic, in-conversion, is itself a period of intentional revitalization.
So, are regenerative and organic synonymous terms? Some say yes, but technically, no.
Organic is a legally protected term, with codified and regulated management practices that are designed to uphold ecological and social welfare. Organic agriculture also has a clearly defined set of required practices, as well as permitted non-toxic pesticides and climate-friendly fertilizers that have been scientifically demonstrated to increase yields and resilience over time; regenerative practices like crop rotations, mulching and minimizing soil disturbance are staples in organic farming.

Conversely, regenerative is not a protected term and is therefore vulnerable to greenwashing (read the fine print). Regenerative standards typically have a defined set of measurable outcomes relating to carbon sequestration in soils, and the good ones even require demonstrated progress towards set targets (something that organic regulations do not yet include), but some allow dubious methods with short-term gains but inadvertent long-term losses.


AS LEADERS IN THE TEXTILE SECTOR, A CRUCIAL QUESTION TO ASK YOURSELF IS HOW TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN AUTHENTIC REGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE, AND MERE IMITATION.


I OFFER YOU THIS:
Do the ends justify the means?
If the goal is to regenerate, how can we condone practices that are not themselves socially and ecologically regenerative? Can we in good conscience continue using synthetic herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers and GMOs and call it regenerative when the science has shown that, although they may appear to increase carbon capture in the short-term, they simultaneously erode long-term production capacity and undermine the ability of an ecosystem to abate and adapt to climate change?
Do the means justify the ends?
Can we in good conscience dogmatically adhere to a prescribed set of conventionalized practices and models, even when the consequences are demonstrably toxic to people and planet? Can we continue sourcing and manufacturing using practices that optimize short-term profit but are known to undermine the sustainability of the entire enterprise?
Coherence of principles, actions and targets is paramount.

THE GOAL IS THE WAY - THE WAY IS THE GOAL.

Read more …Regenerative is Organic

Case Study: Original Favorites

GOTS Case Study:
Original Favorites

Company Snapshot

Location: Denver
Years in operation: 8
Year you received GOTS certification: 2023
Number of employees: 6
Types of products: Wholesale T-shirts and Fleece Knitwear
Where can consumers find your products: https://originalfavorites.com/ 


Original Favorites specialises in crafting luxury wholesale blank garments tailored for various businesses seeking premium blanks for customising and decorating. The company's product line encompasses an array of high-quality blanks, including sweats, t-shirts, and knit beanies. These garments are exclusively made from the finest materials such as Supima® cotton, Cashmere Merino Wool, and organic cotton fibres.


Sustainability Initiatives

Established in 2016, Original Favorites embarked on a mission to create luxury wholesale blank garments that combine an unwavering commitment to quality with a profound dedication to environmentally sustainable and ethically sound manufacturing. The journey commenced with a meticulous evaluation of raw materials, prioritising the utilisation of the world's finest natural fibres. An essential aspect of the company’s commitment to environmental stewardship includes considering both the land and the people involved in the cultivation process. This emphasis on ethical practices and sustainability spans the entire production process, ultimately guiding every decision.


Why GOTS Certification?

 

 

GOTS certification impeccably aligns with the company's core values and its enduring commitment to responsible and sustainable practices. Certification also assures the company and its clients that the strict and rigorous requirements of the Standard have been successfully undertaken. GOTS certification and label on final products acts as a significant value addition, attracting clients due to the authenticity, transparency, and credibility it offers.


Looking Ahead

Original Favorites aims to concentrate on educating and encouraging clients to demand proof from their suppliers, emphasising the importance of responsible and sustainable practices within the industry. Its recent GOTS certification serves as a testament to the company's unwavering commitment to quality, sustainability, and transparency, firmly establishing a high standard within the luxury wholesale blank garment sector. 


Read more …Case Study: Original Favorites

A Conversation with 2 GOTS Approved Consultants

What is your role as a GOTS Certified Consultant?

Katharina Schaus: I see my most important role as a "mediator" between the standard setter (GOTS), the standard users (traders, producer, manufacturers) and the certification bodies as well as accreditation bodies. I very much hope to be able to encourage and guide the requirements, processes, further developments for all involved "parties" in the GOTS-system as best as possible. Since I understand GOTS from all angles, I see myself in a position to support GOTS in its further development/improvement, to advise companies in their preparation for certification, but equally to accompany certification bodies in their accreditation and business development.

Ely Battalen: I work with brands and manufacturers in a two-phase process. First, I analyse if the client is prepared to pass the audit, and then secondly, I work with the client to implement procedures, processes, etc., needed to bring them into compliance.

What might a company or brand need to do or think about before they can achieve (apply for?) certification?

KS: Companies need to be clear about their sustainability goals and consider whether GOTS certification is a suitable instrument to implement their own goals. They need to study the standard/requirements in order to be able to determine whether they can comply with them at all. That certification means a lot of documentation is not clear to many. Nor that certification means independent quality assurance and that a fair budget must be available for this service provided by the certification bodies. On the other hand, certificates cannot simply be “bought”, no - they have to be elaborated. Thus, it must also be conscious that time and willingness for documentation and adjustments is necessary.

EB: Being certified to GOTS is not only about organic fibre, but the standard covers social and environmental aspects, as well as the need for a high level of inventory control.

Do you have any advice for a business that is considering getting certified or introducing certified products?

KS: It requires know-how to get certified or to include certified products in the portfolio. This know-how must come from somewhere. The companies can try to build it up effortfully on ¬their own. Or they have the option to call in us approved consultants as supporters, which makes the processes and implementation more profound and much easier. The GOTS system is demanding and thus there is plenty of potential for errors with possibly result in unpleasant consequences. To avoid mistakes and associated consequences, I can highly recommend the involvement of the consultants. In addition, I think it is very important that companies strive for certification out of conviction and not because pressure and demands are imposed from outside. Then, they will make a successful use of certification and their certified products.

EB: Contact a certified consultant! 

One source of change in the textile processing industry is the constant improvement of the science and technology involved. What are some of the significant changes you’ve seen? How do those changes impact certification? 

EB: One shift I’ve noticed recently is the replacement of workers with technology/robotics. This can mean the employment of fewer workers but also increased safety.

KS: I find the possibility of DNA tagging on cotton fibres a very groundbreaking development, especially in light of issues such as GMO contamination and organic fraud. This technology offers a solution to these problems and at the same time an innovative traceability tool. Herewith a method is available for the certification, which allows to secure and trace back some requirements even better, which is not used obligatorily until now. If all organic cotton were marked with the DNA tracers, the assurance of origin would be greatly improved and there would be reliable data on available quantities of certified fiber and materials, which currently do not exist.

But another, not technical related issue will have a significant impact on certification. There will be a flood of new laws/regulations especially for the textile industry, which have to be implemented already in the next years - supply chain law / due diligence law, EU strategy for sustainable and recyclable textiles in Europe, new waste regulations, etc. Certification must also be able to provide evidence of compliance with these laws/regulations. If this succeeds, then certification will continue to gain enormously in importance and can therefore expect a large increase of demand in the coming years.

What are some misconceptions about certification and what should people know? 

KS: The standards / requirements apply equally to all companies, whether in Asia or in Europe. No exception or individual adjustment can or will be made for anyone individually. Furthermore, the job of the certification bodies is to verify compliance with all requirements, but not to develop the standards or make adjustments for individuals. In other words, this means, certification bodies are not in the position to offer consulting services as well as sourcing services. But many companies expect these kind of services from certifiers and are annoyed when they do not receive advice. This is exactly why it made sense for GOTS to integrate independent, approved consultants into its system. In my opinion, this significantly improves implementation and further development. It also makes companies feel satisfied and comforted if they also have a resource for guidance.

Certification is more credible than self-statements. In addition, GOTS as an independent certification system is by far less expensive than setting up an own sustainability program and/or sustainable seal. GOTS is an excellently established independent standard with a number of benefits. Quite reasonably, GOTS is called the most recommendable standard in the field of natural fibers. GOTS has now grown to over 12,000 certified companies, because this standard managed to harmonize with numerous other schemes in the early 2000s. The strength of GOTS is that the requirements are set across the entire value chain, covering social and environmental aspects with high standards. Of course, a high standard is not always easy to be achieved, but I am pleased when many companies approach me so that I can support them in the implementation and clarification of all concerns.

EB: A frequent misconception is a client believing that by having a Transaction Certificate from their supplier, they are abiding by the standard and can then make label claims.

 

More information about Katharina and Ely can be found at their websites: 

Katharina Schaus website - http://www.itfits.de

Ely Battalen website - www.ewbconsultingllc.com